Devendra Kumar
The publisher of the Sun newspaper, News Group Newspapers Limited, has filed a lawsuit against ITV and ITN in the UK High Court, seeking to protect its intellectual property rights over a video featuring Britain’s Princess of Wales, Kate, at a farm shop in Windsor.
The video, obtained by The Sun, shows Kate and Prince William in public for the first time since her surgery, showcasing the princess with her hair down, wearing a black jacket and leggings, chatting with Prince William and carrying a large white bag.
The footage has sparked a flurry of speculation about Kate’s health and whereabouts, with many conspiracy theories circulating online. According to the filing, the claim relates to the video, which has raised concerns about Kate’s health and motivations, despite the princess’s absence from official duties being attributed to her surgery and subsequent medical treatment.
The publication of the Sun footage has drawn criticism, particularly in light of Kate’s recent controversy over an image of her and her children being released for Mother’s Day, only to be withdrawn by picture agencies due to concerns it had been digitally altered. The princess issued a public apology in response to the controversy, further fueling online speculation about her health and whereabouts.
The incident has put the royal family under intense scrutiny, with many questioning Kate’s motivations and health. Meanwhile, Kate was honored last month as a Royal Companion of The Order of the Companions of Honour by the King for her public service and support of the arts.
The legal battle is seen as an attempt by the publisher to protect its intellectual property rights in the video, as well as to ensure that it is not used without permission. The case is now scheduled to be heard in court, with the outcome potentially having significant implications for the use of celebrity footage in the media. As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen whether the video will continue to spark curiosity and conspiracy theories, or whether the courts will ultimately determine its use. The publisher’s move has raised questions about the delicate balance between privacy and intellectual property, particularly in of celebrity news and media coverage.